Applications of Mathematical Induction
We can apply the process of mathematical induction to formally prove general results from other mathematical topics such as calculus and probability.
For example, we can:
- Prove differential and integral calculus results
- Prove combinatoric and probability theorems
- Prove geometric results
In these proofs, we will see that proof by inductiion provides the framework for our proof, but there is often considerable work to be done to prove the foundational results. The power of the inductive proof is the ability to generalise the results to a wider scope of situations than the foundational results can handle.
Applying mathetical induction to prove differential calculus results
We can use mathmatical induction to generalise certain results in calculus. For example, we have been using the result
dxd(xn)=nxn−1,n∈N
but we have not formally proven that this result holds. However, we can use mathematical induction to achieve this and applying the first principles for differential calculus. The first definition we will use is that of a derivative, which is
dxd(f(x))=limh→0hf(x+h)−f(x)
We will also use the result of the product rule, which is that
dxd(f(x)g(x))dxd(f(x)g(x))dxd(f(x)g(x))dxd(f(x)g(x))dxd(f(x)g(x))dxd(f(x)g(x))dxd(f(x)g(x))dxd(f(x)g(x))=h→0limhf(x+h)g(x+h)−f(x)g(x)=h→0limhf(x+h)g(x+h)−f(x+h)g(x)+f(x+h)g(x)−f(x)g(x)=h→0lim(hf(x+h)g(x+h)−f(x+h)g(x)+hf(x+h)g(x)−f(x)g(x))=h→0lim(f(x+h)hg(x+h)−g(x)+g(x)hf(x+h)−f(x))=h→0lim(f(x+h)hg(x+h)−g(x))+h→0lim(g(x)hf(x+h)−f(x))=h→0lim(f(x+h))h→0lim(hg(x+h)−g(x))+g(x)h→0lim(hf(x+h)−f(x))=f(x)h→0lim(hg(x+h)−g(x))+g(x)h→0lim(hf(x+h)−f(x))=f(x)dxd(g(x))+g(x)dxd(f(x))
The base case, n=1
Consider the case when n=1, in this case we have f(x)=x, and we can then see that
dxd(f(x))dxd(x1)dxd(x1)dxd(x1)dxd(x1)=h→0limhf(x+h)−f(x)=h→0limhx+h−x=h→0limhh=h→0lim1=1
So we see that for n=1, the base case is satisfied.
The inductive step
To prove the inductive step, we establish our inductive hypothesis for n=k, which is that
dxd(xk)=kxk−1
We now want to show that
dxd(xk+1)=(k+1)xk
To do this, we calculate the derivative of xk+1 and apply the product rule
dxd(xk+1)dxd(xk+1)dxd(xk+1)=dxd(xk⋅x1)=x1⋅dxd(xk)+xk⋅dxd(x1)=x1⋅dxd(xk)+xk⋅1
We can then apply our inductive hypothesis to get
dxd(xk+1)dxd(xk+1)dxd(xk+1)dxd(xk+1)=x1⋅dxd(xk)+xk⋅1=x1⋅kxk−1+xk⋅1=kxk+xk=(k+1)xk
This is the result we were trying to prove, and so we can then apply inductive reasoning that the relationship
dxd(xn)=nxn−1
does indeed apply for all n∈N.
...
Log in or sign up to see more